Noise reduction in low-light still-life scenes

in News

The current issue of the Pbase magazine has an interesting article on noise reduction in low-light still-life scenes by shooting multiple images and combining them in Photoshop CS3 or later using Stacks.
http://i2.pbase.com/o1/mag/pbase_magazine_vol13_jun2010.pdf
(22nd page)

This is a shortened version of a method used by astrophotographers for combining multiple shots. It used to be very painful to do this in Photoshop so astrophotographers mostly use special software. The method described can greatly reduce random noise in the final image. It will not remove "fixed pattern noise" due to hot pixels and differing sensitivities or offsets in different pixels. For that we could subtract a "dark frame" ( on) of the same exposure length from each image before combining. The best dark frame uses the same technique of combining several individual dark shots to reduce the random noise in the dark frame. Mostly it's only the astro guys who are wiling to do that much work for one image!

Tags: random noise, , , ,

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Dario Shenkel August 15, 2010 at 8:16 pm

In D. C. they were introduced to national geographic and National Geographic staffers who perused their work and gave them pointers; these meetings were proved to be anything but lip service earlier this year when 2006 honoree Newsha Tavakolian landed National Geographic Magazine’s August cover story, Persia: Ancient Soul of Iran. After the festival the honorees traveled to New York, where the program’s organizers helped them set up interviews with editors at papers, magazines, and galleries.

Rima Mcilroy August 16, 2010 at 10:27 am

This camera suits the way in which one lives and enjoys. One can capture both stills as well as movies with this digital camera. Further, one can take images having a standard size of 4:3 ratio and can view it with 16:9 widescreen which is enough to fill the TV screen. Further, its sports a 28mm wide-angle lens that enable a person to take wider pictures.

Robert Jennings July 15, 2011 at 12:13 pm

I?m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future. All the best

Helen Stillman-Jones July 20, 2011 at 2:20 pm

I am curious to find out what blog platform you’re utilizing? I’m having some small security issues with my latest blog and I’d like to find something more secure. Do you have any suggestions?

SALESCOACH July 30, 2011 at 6:42 pm

One of my favorite plants is the Chinese evergreen, or aglaonema. It puts up with low to medium light and comes in a wide variety of styles: different heights, and many different interesting leaf patterns.

There are many good dracaenas that do well in medium to low light. Warneckii is a good example that really brightens an area. I like the varigated leaves that are offered in many of our house plants as a way of adding interest to the home.

When it comes to really low light areas, the spathiphyllum, or closet plant, is the queen of the home. This one can put up with less light than any other species. It produces these little bloom structures that turn white and can be quite attractive.

In order to have success with house pants, you want to make sure and not over water them. We do tend to over water our house plants too often and it just causes root rot. In a low light environment, they just don't use as much water as they would in a bright outdoor environment.

Secondly, don't try to over fertilize. You can't replace light with extra fertilizer; that just creates additional problems. If you'l move them periodically to a brighter environment to let them gather some light, produce carbohydrates, and replinish their strength, then you can move them back in.

Previous post:

Next post: